Leica SL3-S vs Sony A9 II
4 · 0 TIE · 3
The Leica SL3-S wins 4 of 7 scored specs (resolution, burst, max video); the A9 II wins 3 (stabilization, battery (cipa)). The A9 II is $81 cheaper.

Leica SL3-S7.6
4 WINSBuy it if you want: resolution, burst, max video, weight.$4,579See price at Amazon

Sony A9 II7.6
3 WINSBuy it if you want: stabilization, battery (cipa).A 24MP stacked-sensor sports camera with a fast electronic shutter and dual UHS-II slots, aimed at action and press shooters who value speed over resolution.Size, to scale
OPEN IN SIZE COMPARE →Outer sizes are exact, from the makers' dimensions. Shapes are drawn by us to show each body style; the dashed circle is the lens mount at its real diameter.
- Leica SL3-S141.2 × 108 × 82.7 mm
- Sony A9 II128.9 × 96.4 × 67.3 mm · 678 g
Where they differ
ADD A THIRD CAMERA →Leica SL3-SA9 II
PRICE & SCORE
$4,579$4,498BEST
PHOTO
24.6 MPBEST24.2 MP
30 fpsBEST20 fps
None5.5 stopsBEST
1/8000 mech · 1/16000 elec1/8000 mech · 1/32000 elec
People, animalsdown to −3 EV
VIDEO
6KBEST4K
4K 60p4K 30p
—No 4K 60p
19.8 ms · 5.8K full width, CineD—
10-bit 4:2:2—
L-LogNone
RAW over HDMI (5.9K 30p to external recorder)None
YesNo
Full-sizeMicro
BODY & HANDLING
315 shots690 shotsBEST
0 gBEST678 g
5.76M-dot, 0.76×3.69M-dot, 0.78×
CFexpress B + SD UHS-II2x SD UHS-II
SYSTEM
L-Mount AllianceSony E
80+200+