Canon EOS R3 vs Sony A9 II
6 · 0 TIE · 2
The R3 wins 6 of 8 scored specs (burst, stabilization, max video); the A9 II wins 2 (resolution, weight). The R3 is $99 cheaper.

Sony A9 II7.6
2 WINSBuy it if you want: resolution, weight.A 24MP stacked-sensor sports camera with a fast electronic shutter and dual UHS-II slots, aimed at action and press shooters who value speed over resolution.Size, to scale
OPEN IN SIZE COMPARE →Outer sizes are exact, from the makers' dimensions. Shapes are drawn by us to show each body style; the dashed circle is the lens mount at its real diameter.
- Canon EOS R3150 × 142.6 × 87.2 mm · 1015 g
- Sony A9 II128.9 × 96.4 × 67.3 mm · 678 g
Where they differ
ADD A THIRD CAMERA →R3A9 II
PRICE & SCORE
$4,399BEST$4,498
9.5BEST7.6
PHOTO
24.1 MP24.2 MPBEST
30 fpsBEST20 fps
8 stopsBEST5.5 stops
1/8000 mech · 1/64000 elec1/8000 mech · 1/32000 elec
People, animals, birds, vehicles · down to −7.5 EVdown to −3 EV
VIDEO
6KBEST4K
4K 120p4K 30p
None, full widthNo 4K 60p
10-bit 4:2:2—
Canon Log 3None
Internal 6K 12-bit Cinema RAW LightNone
BODY & HANDLING
860 shotsBEST690 shots
1015 g678 gBEST
5.76M-dot, 0.76×3.69M-dot, 0.78×
Fully articulatingTilting
CFexpress B + SD UHS-II2x SD UHS-II
SYSTEM
Canon RFSony E
60+200+
