Fujifilm X-H2S vs Nikon Z9
4 · 0 TIE · 4
The X-H2S wins 4 of 8 scored specs (burst, stabilization, weight); the Z9 wins 4 (resolution, max video, battery (cipa)). The X-H2S is $1,898 cheaper.
More price sources coming soon. Prices accurate as of Oct 27, 2:15 AM ET and subject to change. We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. How this works
Size, to scale
OPEN IN SIZE COMPARE →Outer sizes are exact, from the makers' dimensions. Shapes are drawn by us to show each body style; the dashed circle is the lens mount at its real diameter.
- Fujifilm X-H2S136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm · 660 g
- Nikon Z9149 × 149.5 × 90.5 mm · 1340 g
Where they differ
ADD A THIRD CAMERA →X-H2SZ9
PRICE & SCORE
$2,899BEST$4,797
8.89.3BEST
PHOTO
26.16 MP45.7 MPBEST
APS-CFull-frame
40 fpsBEST30 fps
7 stopsBEST6 stops
1/8000 mech · 1/32000 elecElectronic only, 1/32000
People, animals, birds, vehicles, aircraft, trains · down to −7 EVPeople, animals, birds, vehicles, aircraft, trains · down to −9 EV
VIDEO
6K8KBEST
9.7 ms · 4K full width, CineD14.5 ms · 8K full width, CineD
F-Log/F-Log2N-Log
ProRes RAW / Blackmagic RAW over HDMIInternal N-RAW + ProRes RAW
YesNo
BODY & HANDLING
580 shots740 shotsBEST
660 gBEST1340 g
5.76M-dot, 0.8×3.69M-dot, 0.8×
Fully articulatingMulti-angle
CFexpress B + SD UHS-II2x CFexpress B
SYSTEM
Fujifilm XNikon Z
40+50+

